Atlantic Philanthropies

Atlantic Reports

Investing in Change: Why Supporting Advocacy Makes Sense for Foundations

16 May 2008

This publication explores the experiences of a growing number of funders around the world that are committed to supporting advocacy as a strategy to advance social change. We are starting with this topic because funding advocacy too often is the philanthropic road not taken, yet it is a road most likely to lead to the kind of lasting change that philanthropy has long sought through other kinds of grants.

This publication provides information and lessons about the wide spectrum of advocacy activities funders can support, including:

Research and Dissemination: Credible research is an excellent tool for raising the profile of a problem and explaining the ongoing impact of a policy or condition on individuals, communities and nations. Many foundations support this frequently.

Raising Awareness: Increasing public consciousness is important to advance action on an issue, because important constituencies are often not fully aware of the problem or its dimensions. These efforts can take many forms, including media placement, advertising, speeches to influential audiences, legislative testimony, regulatory boards and commissions. In The Republic of Ireland, the Forum on Migration and Communications (FOMACS) has a three-year media programme to increase awareness of immigration and integration issues.

Community Organising: Supporting communities that organise on their own behalf is a critical component of funding advocacy, enabling those most affected to voice their concerns and promote their interests with government officials and powerful private entities. The Treatment Action Campaign in South Africa, fighting for HIV treatment and the rights of people living with HIV/AIDS, is an example of the importance of this kind of work.

Grassroots Mobilisation: Demonstrating broad-based public support for policy change is crucial to success. Mobilising membership organisations, coalitions and others to visit elected officials and their staffs – or to generate greater public awareness of an issue – can be highly powerful in bringing about policy change. InThe Republic of Ireland, the Irish Senior Citizens Parliament organised the unprecedented moblisation of up to 20,000 older people from all over Ireland to protest outside the Irish Parliament and they successfully stopped the proposed withdrawal of government medical cards for 95 per cent of people over age 70.

Building Capacity: Supporting staff, infrastructure and membership development of advocacy organisations is another important way to enable long-term change, and has been a key tool of our U.S. human rights effort to challenge the former Bush Administration’s incursions on civil liberties.

Policy Development: Developing policy options can aid change by providing advocates, legislators and others with credible suggestions for solving problems and supporters with a goal to rally around. Atlantic’s grant to the Center for Law and Social Policy is aimed at strengthening the center’s ability to influence and inform U.S. federal and state policy affecting disadvantaged children and their families.

Lobbying: Some funders may develop, refine or amend legislative language or support proposed legislation or ballot initiatives at the local, state or federal level. Countries regulate lobbying differently, so conferring with legal counsel is the best approach. Good examples are Atlantic’s work to advance comprehensive immigration and health-care reforms in the U.S.

Litigation: Taking legal action to achieve desired changes or fight undesired policies and practices is a tool that advocates have long used effectively. This is how Atlantic grantees brought about same-sex marriage in South Africa and an end to the juvenile death penalty in the United States.

All of these activities, ranging from research to lobbying, can contribute to lasting change. As a funder committed to solving some of the greatest challenges before us today, Atlantic is striving to support these approaches even more frequently and ever more effectively while encouraging others to do so as well.

We are always interested in your feedback.  Please fill out the form below to submit your comments.

Research on Democratic practice in Ireland 2011R

On Advocacy:

Any activity within the democratic system of elected representation and Government decision making is good activity.

By passing elected representatives and forming ad hoc "academic" advocacy may be undemocratic.

Mostly this may be an ego trip for a very small and unrepresentative group of "academics".

Eg four "academics" with one vote each act to by pass the elected TDSs(representatives)and based on spurious ( artifically created interest grouping ) proceed to advocate their agenda.

In advocacy , if they group of four develop an active group of 1000 ( randomly selected etc) then inevitably the power/representative ownership transfers to a broader grouping (than four initiators.)

That the four initators of advocacy retain all power over this advocacy process is unreal and undemocratic, an ego trip.

Most importantly, the dismissal(exclusion)(with 12,000-20,000 votes) of the elected representatives by four "academics" with four votes.

This is like attempting to have a direct line to God .

The short circuiting of the democratically elected representatives by four voters is arrogant.

Organising interest groups( lobbying) may be advocacy but the gropu must use the democratically elected representative(s) to further their case to government.

Four individuals developoing a false representative group simply to influence government directly is profoundly undemocratic.

Atlantic Philantropies has funded such a group of four in Ireland.
For every funding in Ireland there might be a counter investigation to give balance and logic before any payment is made.

Donal Buckley

Tel 09064 81021
Mob 087 2539719.

  • Share / Print

News and Updates

MORE >
Copyright © 2011 The Atlantic Philanthropies. All Rights Reserved.